Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Mahasiswa/i Memilih Program Studi Pariwisata Jurusan Pariwisata di Politeknik Negeri Samarinda

  • Sabalius Uhai Tourism Departement, Samarinda State Polytechnik
  • Rini Koen Iswandari Tourism Departement, Samarinda State Polytechnik
  • Musdalifah Tourism Departement, Samarinda State Polytechnik
  • Rina Oktavianti Alumni Tourism Departement, Samarinda State Polytechnik
Abstract views: 35 , PDF downloads: 27
Keywords: Individual personality, Job prospect, college image, family support

Abstract

His study aims to determine whether individual personality factors, job prospect factors, college image factors, and family support factors simultaneously influence the decision to choose a tourism study program at the Department of Tourism in Samarinda State Polytechnic? Do individual personality factors, job prospect factors, college image factors, and family support factors partially influence the decision to choose a tourism study program at the Department of Tourism in Samarinda State Polytechnic? This study uses multiple regression analysis and is used to analyze the results of the study. H1 accepted Then the individual personality factor variable has a dominant influence on the decision to choose a tourism study program. I can see that the count> table is (6,844)> (1,664) and a significant value of 0,000> 0,005. With the regression coefficient value is positive that is equal to 0, 414. I accepted then h1 the prospect of employment affects the decision to choose a tourism study program, I can see that the count> table is (2.581)> (1,664) and a significant value of 0.01 < 0.05. The regression coefficient value is positive at 0.277. H1 is accepted, then the image of the college influences the decision to choose tourism study programs. I can see that the value of dignity> table (1.432) <(1.664) With the positive coefficient of regression is 0.097 H1 is accepted then family support influences the decision to choose a study program tourism, it can be seen that the value of count> table is (2.007)> (1,664) and a significant value of 0.04 <0.05. Based on the ANOVA test, a Fcount of 45,947 can be obtained with a significant level of 0,000. Therefore, the probability is much smaller than 0.05 (0.000 <0.05) and Fcount> Table (45.947> 2.32), so it can be stated that the independent variables include individual personality factors (X1), employment prospect factors ( X2), college image factor (X3), and family support factor (X4) simultaneously or jointly influence the decision variable in choosing a tourism study program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. Augusty, F. (2006). Metode Penelitian Manajemen: Pedoman Penelitian untuk skripsi, Tesis dan Disertai Ilmu Manajemen. Universitas Diponegoro.

. Bilson Simamora. (2008). Panduan Riset Perilaku Konsumen (Edisi keti). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

. Friedman, M. . (2010). Buku Ajar Keperawatan Keluarga: Riset, Teori dan Praktek. EGC.

. Indra Novianto Adibayu Pamungkas. (2019). Pentingnya Komunikasi Orang Tua dan Anak dalam Memilih Jurusan Kuliah. Kumparan. https://kumparan.com/indra-imi/pentingnya-komunikasi-orang-tua-dan-anak-dalam-memilih-jurusan-kuliah-1rWRoQJZLTg/full

. J. P Chaplin. (n.d.). Kamus Lengkap Psikologi (Edisi terj). Raja Grafindo Persada.

. Krugman, P. R. and M. O. (2003). International Economics: Theory and Policy (6th Edition). Pearson Education.

. Lestari, S. (2018). Peran Teknologi dalam Pendidikan di Era Globalisasi. Edureligia; Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2), 94–100.

. Lestari, Sri. (2012). Penanaman Nilai dan Penanganan Konflik dalam Keluarga. Prenada Media Group.

. M Ridki Zarkasyi. (2013). Entrepreneur Radikal. Renebook.

. Nuryadin, Muhammad Teguh, Marijati Sangen, S. A. A. (2017). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi mahasiswa dalam memilih Program Studi Pada Jurusan Administrasi Bisnis Politeknik Negeri Banjarmasin. Jurnal Wawasan Manajemen, Vol. 5, No.

. Pendidikan, D. N. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Keempat, p. 368). Balai Pustaka.

. Philip Kotler, K. L. K. (2010). Prilaku Konsumen. Erlangga.

. Prodjo, W. A. (n.d.). 8 Tips Jitu Memilih Program Studi Kuliah. Kompas.Com. https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2019/11/11/19560321/8-tips-jitu-memilih-program-studi-kuliah?page=all

. Rohmat. (2012). Pilar Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. Cipta Media Aksara.

. Sarafino. (2000). Health Psychology : Biopsychososial Interaction. John Wilky and Sons Inc.

. Schiffman, L. G. and L. L. K. (2011). Consumer Behavior (Tenth Edit). Pearson Education.

. Setiadi nugroho. (2013). Prilaku Konsumen (Edisi Revi). Kencana.

. Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

. Wahy, H. (2012). Keluarga sebagai basis pendidikan pertama dan utama. Jurnal Ilmiah DIDAKTIKA, VOL. XII N, 245–258.

. Yusuf LN, J. N. (2007). Teori Kepribadian. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

. Zainal Anawar. (2012). A-Z Psikologi, berbagai kumpulan topik psikologi. Andi Offset.

. Zuyun Nela. (2013). Hubungan antara dukungan keluarga dengan motivasi melanjutkan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK). Jurnal Online, 5. http://www.jogjapress.com/

How to Cite
Sabalius Uhai, Rini Koen Iswandari, Musdalifah, & Rina Oktavianti. (1). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Mahasiswa/i Memilih Program Studi Pariwisata Jurusan Pariwisata di Politeknik Negeri Samarinda. EDUTOURISM Journal Of Tourism Research, 1(01), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.53050/ejtr.v1i01.154